https://redmine.lighttpd.net/https://redmine.lighttpd.net/favicon.ico?13667327412007-11-14T21:07:55Zlighty labsLighttpd - Feature #1455: patch for mod_usertrack to use of expires versus max-agehttps://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/1455?journal_id=35532007-11-14T21:07:55ZMitchLewandowski
<ul></ul><p>Obviously you wouldn't need the commented versions of what we replaced (forgot we didn't remove those after we got it to work).</p> Lighttpd - Feature #1455: patch for mod_usertrack to use of expires versus max-agehttps://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/1455?journal_id=43742008-10-08T19:02:08Zstbuehler
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>1.4.20</i> to <i>1.4.21</i></li></ul> Lighttpd - Feature #1455: patch for mod_usertrack to use of expires versus max-agehttps://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/1455?journal_id=53612009-02-05T15:53:32Zicy
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>1.4.21</i> to <i>1.4.22</i></li><li><strong>Patch available</strong> set to <i>Yes</i></li></ul> Lighttpd - Feature #1455: patch for mod_usertrack to use of expires versus max-agehttps://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/1455?journal_id=55462009-02-28T19:15:21Zstbuehler
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>1.4.22</i> to <i>1.4.23</i></li></ul> Lighttpd - Feature #1455: patch for mod_usertrack to use of expires versus max-agehttps://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/1455?journal_id=60322009-06-10T17:27:22Zstbuehler
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>1.4.23</i> to <i>1.4.24</i></li></ul> Lighttpd - Feature #1455: patch for mod_usertrack to use of expires versus max-agehttps://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/1455?journal_id=64302009-10-12T09:36:41Zstbuehler
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Wontfix</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> deleted (<del><i>jan</i></del>)</li><li><strong>Target version</strong> deleted (<del><i>1.4.24</i></del>)</li></ul><p>(T_CONFIG_INT solves the range problem)</p>
<p>Let me quote <a class="external" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ieinternals/archive/2009/08/20/WinINET-IE-Cookie-Internals-FAQ.aspx">http://blogs.msdn.com/ieinternals/archive/2009/08/20/WinINET-IE-Cookie-Internals-FAQ.aspx</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Internet Explorer (including IE8) does not attempt to support any RFC for cookies.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Now if they would argue why max-age is a bad idea one could understand it. But i think max-age is the better parameter (expires requires synchronized clocks), and i don't care about stupid software; and the expires syntax if not rfc conform (unquoted value).</p> Lighttpd - Feature #1455: patch for mod_usertrack to use of expires versus max-agehttps://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/1455?journal_id=138532024-01-03T06:25:39Zgstrauss
<ul><li><strong>ASK QUESTIONS IN Forums</strong> set to <i>No</i></li></ul><p>mod_usertrack is no longer part of the lighttpd base<br />For replacement, see <a class="wiki-page" href="https://redmine.lighttpd.net/projects/lighttpd/wiki/ModMagnetExamples#lua-mod_usertrack">lua mod_usertrack</a></p> Lighttpd - Feature #1455: patch for mod_usertrack to use of expires versus max-agehttps://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/1455?journal_id=138732024-01-03T07:52:20Zgstrauss
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Wontfix</i> to <i>Obsolete</i></li></ul>