https://redmine.lighttpd.net/https://redmine.lighttpd.net/favicon.ico?13667327412008-10-05T10:21:00Zlighty labsLighttpd - Bug #1786: poor performance from lighttpd 1.5.0https://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/1786?journal_id=43492008-10-05T10:21:00ZAnonymous
<ul></ul><p>Just tested with lighttpd-1.4.20, it is also fast.</p> Lighttpd - Bug #1786: poor performance from lighttpd 1.5.0https://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/1786?journal_id=43502008-10-05T10:23:15ZAnonymous
<ul></ul><p>Why use such a old 1.5? you get an newer one here <a class="external" href="http://opensu.se/~darix/lighttpd/">http://opensu.se/~darix/lighttpd/</a><br />and use gtherad-aio insted of linux-aio.</p> Lighttpd - Bug #1786: poor performance from lighttpd 1.5.0https://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/1786?journal_id=43512008-10-05T10:57:22Zstbuehler
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Fixed</i></li><li><strong>Resolution</strong> set to <i>invalid</i></li></ul> Lighttpd - Bug #1786: poor performance from lighttpd 1.5.0https://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/1786?journal_id=43522008-10-05T10:58:57ZAnonymous
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Fixed</i> to <i>Need Feedback</i></li><li><strong>Resolution</strong> deleted (<del><i>invalid</i></del>)</li></ul><p>I downloaded 1.5 from the first hit on google for: lighttpd 1.5</p>
<p><a class="external" href="http://www.lighttpd.net/2007/2/3/lighttpd-1-5-0-pre">http://www.lighttpd.net/2007/2/3/lighttpd-1-5-0-pre</a></p>
<p>I used linux-aio-sendfile because of this page that it linked to:</p>
<p><a class="external" href="http://www.lighttpd.net/2007/2/3/raw-io-performance">http://www.lighttpd.net/2007/2/3/raw-io-performance</a></p>
<p>Using 1.5.0.prerelease.r2294 with gthread-aio as you suggest gives 2 kreq/s. Still slower than lighttpd 1.4</p> Lighttpd - Bug #1786: poor performance from lighttpd 1.5.0https://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/1786?journal_id=43532008-10-05T11:38:01Zstbuehler
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Need Feedback</i> to <i>Fixed</i></li><li><strong>Resolution</strong> set to <i>invalid</i></li></ul><p>2kreq/s or 3kreq/s ... as long as you cannot tell us why there is something specific wrong i don't care (that is: provide a patch); it is not a bug. The design of 1.5 is more complex, so of course it is slower; and benchmarking one small file is just... not really benchmarking.</p> Lighttpd - Bug #1786: poor performance from lighttpd 1.5.0https://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/1786?journal_id=43542008-10-05T11:41:56ZAnonymous
<ul></ul><p>That is quite a bit slower. If the design of 1.5 is really this much slower, maybe the new slow parts should be optional.</p>
<p>Or, maybe I should just stay on 1.4 instead.</p> Lighttpd - Bug #1786: poor performance from lighttpd 1.5.0https://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/1786?journal_id=47302008-10-10T18:54:56Zstbuehler
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Fixed</i> to <i>Invalid</i></li></ul>