Activity
From 2026-04-29 to 2026-05-05
Today
- GS 15:51 Lighttpd Feature #3304: Host selection for sockproxy via SNI
- > The default backend host can be different, right?
Yes.
Would you be able to test a patch against src/mod_sockproxy.c to validate this can work? See attached sockproxy.patch.
2026-05-02
- UL 17:47 Lighttpd Feature #3304: Host selection for sockproxy via SNI
- gstrauss wrote in #note-5:
> Proposal: *if* all requests to a given socket are to be sent to [[mod_sockproxy]], I _might_ be able to modify [[mod_sockproxy]] to reconfigure the chosen backend host after the SNI. Before I try to do this...
2026-04-30
- GS 06:05 Lighttpd Feature #3304: Host selection for sockproxy via SNI
- Proposal: *if* all requests to a given socket are to be sent to [[mod_sockproxy]], I _might_ be able to modify [[mod_sockproxy]] to reconfigure the chosen backend host after the SNI. Before I try to do this, would be that be acceptable?...
2026-04-29
- GS 04:56 Lighttpd Feature #3304: Host selection for sockproxy via SNI
- I took a deeper look in the code and this is what I found in the current implementation: when the connection accepted hook is run, the TLS Client Hello has not yet been received, so the SNI has not yet been set, and therefore [[mod_sockp...