Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

Feature #513

closed

idea for relative AF_UNIX sockets

Added by Anonymous about 19 years ago. Updated over 16 years ago.

Status:
Wontfix
Priority:
Normal
Category:
core
Target version:
-
ASK QUESTIONS IN Forums:

Description

Issue #394 closes off the possibility of specifying an AF_UNIX socket as a relative path. But why can't a server.bind that starts with a dot also be interpreted as an AF_UNIX socket? Do AF_INET/AF_INET6 addresses ever start with a dot?

I would appreciate it if you considered this option.

-- chad

Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by stbuehler over 16 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Fixed
  • Resolution set to wontfix

Just use


server.bind = var.cwd + "/lighttpd.sock"
Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by stbuehler over 16 years ago

  • Status changed from Fixed to Wontfix
Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom