Activity
From 2025-05-16 to 2025-05-22
2025-05-21
- 06:39 Lighttpd Feature #3282: Add build support for AWS-LC as openssl variant
- Feedback: in hindsight, I think that your original title for this feature request was *under-specified*.
The origi... - 06:14 Lighttpd Feature #3282: Add build support for AWS-LC as openssl variant
- Answer to your questions:
* I never tested boringssl
* I use static linking with AWS-LC
* I started a real test re...
2025-05-19
2025-05-17
- 23:56 Lighttpd Feature #3282 (Missing Feedback): Add build support for AWS-LC as openssl variant
- https://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/3282#note-2
> AWS-LC seems to be good choice as TLS library and I want support f... - 05:18 Lighttpd Revision 5ac7eecb: [mod_openssl] AWS-LC limitations/compatibility (#3282)
- AWS-LC is derived from BoringSSL, but AWSLC_API_VERSION has different
meaning. Reuse BORINGSSL_API_VERSION for (pres... - 05:13 Lighttpd Revision c010afe1: [mod_openssl] avoid BoringSSL/AWS-LC compiler warn
- avoid compiler warnings and deprecated functions
BoringSSL/AWS-LC OPENSSL_sk_num() return value is size_t instead of...
2025-05-16
- 14:58 Lighttpd Feature #3282: Add build support for AWS-LC as openssl variant
- The fact remains that you're asking for a serious commitment of time and effort to make sure AWS-LC *actually* works....
- 08:44 Lighttpd Feature #3282: Add build support for AWS-LC as openssl variant
- Maybe it was the wrong way, to write this as a feature ticket, but I try to explain my intentions:
* I read the hapr... - 05:34 Lighttpd Feature #3282: Add build support for AWS-LC as openssl variant
- > AWS-LC seems to be good choice as TLS library and I want support for it added to lighttpd.
@flynn have you built...
Also available in: Atom